Comparación: Nexen CP672 A vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun vs. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium

2. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Premium

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Medio-alto

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Medio-alto

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 658

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 194

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

4. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 101

5. Nexen CP672 A 2

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 33x

2. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 26x

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 23x

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 2.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2.

4. Bridgestone Turanza T005 1.

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 19.

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 15.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

4. Bridgestone Turanza T005 11.

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 7.54

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 6.57

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

4. Bridgestone Turanza T005 4.09

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 2025

2. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 2025

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2025

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Ejemplar

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Ejemplar

3. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Muy recomendable

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Bueno

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Bueno

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Bueno

3. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Todavía recomendado

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Todavía recomendado

5. Nexen CP672 A ?