Comparación: Nokian WR Snowproof P vs. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Medio-alto

2. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro Medio-alto

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Medio-alto

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Medio-alto

5. Barum Polaris 5 Bajo costo

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 97

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

3. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 78

4. Barum Polaris 5 76

5. Nokian WR Snowproof P 55

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Barum Polaris 5 13x

3. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 13x

4. Nokian WR Snowproof P 7x

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 3x

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.

3. Nokian WR Snowproof P 4.

4. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 7.

5. Barum Polaris 5 9.

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 5.

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

3. Nokian WR Snowproof P 18.

4. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 20.

5. Barum Polaris 5 26.

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.33

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

3. Nokian WR Snowproof P 9.71

4. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 11.92

5. Barum Polaris 5 15.15

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 2025

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 2025

4. Nokian WR Snowproof P 2025

5. Barum Polaris 5 2023

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Muy bien

2. Barum Polaris 5 Bueno

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Bueno

4. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactorio

5. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro Satisfactorio

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Bueno

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Bueno

3. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactorio

4. Barum Polaris 5 Suficiente

5. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro Suficiente

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

94%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

80%

Nokian
WR Snowproof P

78%

Barum
Polaris 5

75%

Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro

59%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Nokian WR Snowproof P 83%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 80%

4. Barum Polaris 5 78%

5. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 67%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 86%

3. Barum Polaris 5 76%

4. Nokian WR Snowproof P 68%

5. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 27%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Nokian WR Snowproof P 78%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 76%

4. Barum Polaris 5 76%

5. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 66%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 89%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 78%

3. Barum Polaris 5 72%

4. Nokian WR Snowproof P 64%

5. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 62%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro

70%

Barum
Polaris 5

63%

Nokian
WR Snowproof P

60%

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 86%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 75%

3. Nokian WR Snowproof P 74%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

5. Barum Polaris 5 56%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 67%

4. Barum Polaris 5 65%

5. Nokian WR Snowproof P 60%

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 73%

3. Nokian WR Snowproof P 72%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

5. Barum Polaris 5 63%

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 81%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 79%

3. Nokian WR Snowproof P 75%

4. Barum Polaris 5 66%

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 66%

3. Barum Polaris 5 64%

4. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 58%

5. Nokian WR Snowproof P 35%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ B

3. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro B

4. Nokian WR Snowproof P B

5. Barum Polaris 5 C

Nokian
WR Snowproof P

91%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro

75%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

70%

Barum
Polaris 5

66%

1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 92%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 79%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

5. Barum Polaris 5 69%

1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 88%

2. Barum Polaris 5 78%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 77%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 93%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 69%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

4. Barum Polaris 5 0%

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Barum
Polaris 5

80%

Nokian
WR Snowproof P

78%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

74%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro

61%

1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 92%

2. Barum Polaris 5 82%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 69%

5. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 60%

1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 81%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

3. Barum Polaris 5 72%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 69%

5. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 54%

1. Barum Polaris 5 86%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 71%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

5. Nokian WR Snowproof P 62%

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ C

2. Nokian WR Snowproof P C

3. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro D

4. Barum Polaris 5 E

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Nokian
WR Snowproof P

82%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro

73%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

70%

Barum
Polaris 5

67%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

2. Nokian WR Snowproof P 71%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 71%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 68%

5. Barum Polaris 5 61%

1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 92%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 76%

4. Barum Polaris 5 74%

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

3. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro ?

4. Barum Polaris 5 ?

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ ?