Comparación: Nexen CP672 A vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun vs. Nokian Powerproof

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Medio-alto

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Medio-alto

4. Nokian Powerproof Medio-alto

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 658

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 194

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

4. Nokian Powerproof 53

5. Nexen CP672 A 2

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 33x

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 23x

3. Nokian Powerproof 11x

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Nokian Powerproof 2.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2.

4. Bridgestone Turanza T005 1.

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Nokian Powerproof 21.

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 15.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

4. Bridgestone Turanza T005 11.

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Nokian Powerproof 7.45

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 6.57

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

4. Bridgestone Turanza T005 4.09

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 2025

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2025

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

4. Nokian Powerproof 2022

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Ejemplar

2. Nokian Powerproof Ejemplar

3. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Ejemplar

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Bueno

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Bueno

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Bueno

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Todavía recomendado

4. Nokian Powerproof Recomendado condicionalmente

5. Nexen CP672 A ?