14 tiendas, 133 289 productos

Comparación: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Tabla de contenido:

Resumen
Mojado
Seco
Nieve
Hielo
Costos
Pruebas mutuas
Comprar %

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /82%	Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 /81%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 P /93%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 /99%	Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ /87%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%

Dimensiones	R14 - R21	R14 - R22	R14 - R17	R16 - R22	R14 - R18	R0 - R21	R14 - R19
Precio	Establecer la dimensión para ver los precios	Establecer la dimensión para ver los precios	Establecer la dimensión para ver los precios	Establecer la dimensión para ver los precios	Establecer la dimensión para ver los precios	Establecer la dimensión para ver los precios	Establecer la dimensión para ver los precios
Eliminar	Eliminar de la comparación	Eliminar de la comparación	Eliminar de la comparación	Eliminar de la comparación	Eliminar de la comparación	Eliminar de la comparación	Eliminar de la comparación

Segmento

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Premium

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Premium

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Premium

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Medio-alto

7. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Medio-alto

Número de tamaños disponibles

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 178

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 97

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

6. Continental WinterContact TS 870 80

7. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 78

Número de pruebas

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 29x

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 17x

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

6. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 14x

7. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 3x

Mejor posición en la prueba

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 1.

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

5. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 2.

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

7. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.

Peor posición en la prueba

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 5.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 8.

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 13.

5. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 14.

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

7. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

Posición media en las pruebas

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.71

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 3.66

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.33

5. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 5.5

6. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

7. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

Año de la última prueba

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 2025

3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 2025

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 2025

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

6. Continental WinterContact TS 870 2024

7. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

Mejor puntuación en la prueba

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Ganador de la prueba

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Muy bien

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Muy bien

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Muy bien

5. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Muy recomendable

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Bueno

7. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Bueno

Peor calificación en la prueba

1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Bueno

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Bueno

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Bueno

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Bueno

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Bueno

6. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Bueno

7. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Recomendado condicionalmente

Mojado

(Calificación general)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

89%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

88%

Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3

84%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Manejo en mojado

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 92%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 86%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 82%

5. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 81%

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

7. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Hidroplaneo - cruzar

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 93%

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 88%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 78%

6. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

7. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 66%

Hidroplaneo - longitudinal

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 92%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 87%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

6. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 74%

7. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

Frenado en mojado

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 95%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 76%

5. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 77%

6. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

7. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 62%

Curvas en mojado

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 90%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 81%

4. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 79%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 67%

7. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

Frenado en mojado según la etiqueta de la ue

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 B

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ B

4. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 B

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P B

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

7. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

Seco

(Calificación general)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

86%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

83%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

82%

Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3

81%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

Frenado en seco

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 86%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

5. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 74%

6. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 74%

7. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

Comportamiento en conducción en seco

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 91%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 82%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 78%

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

7. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 0%

Manejo en seco

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 91%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 87%

4. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 85%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

7. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Rendimiento en seco

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 78%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 77%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 59%

6. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

7. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 0%

Costos

(Calificación general)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

76%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

75%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

74%

Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3

73%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

59%

Precio / valor

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 73%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 70%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 68%

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 60%

7. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 49%

Resistencia al rodamiento

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 92%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 89%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

6. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 73%

7. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 69%

Kilometraje

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 83%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 76%

3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 74%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 69%

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 64%

7. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 37%

Consumo de combustible según la etiqueta de la ue

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 C

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 C

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ C

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

6. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P C

7. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Nieve

(Calificación general)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

89%

Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3

81%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

78%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

77%

Manejo en nieve

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 86%

4. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 78%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 72%

7. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 65%

Tracción en nieve

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

4. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 81%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 76%

7. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 75%

Frenado en nieve

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

5. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 83%

6. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

7. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 80%

Confort

(Calificación general)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

92%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

82%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

81%

Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3

75%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

54%

Ruido exterior

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 86%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 81%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 75%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

7. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 65%

Ruido interior

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 98%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 84%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 80%

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 33%

7. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Ruido exterior según la etiqueta de la ue

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 ?

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

4. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 ?

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

6. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ?

7. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ ?

Hielo

(Calificación general)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

85%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3

0%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

0%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

0%

Frenar en hielo

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 85%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 82%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P -27%

6. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 0%

7. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Añadir a comparación

Hacer

Modelo

Comparación: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Añadir a comparación

Añadir a comparación

Verano

Posiciones

Pruebas

Marcas

Posiciones

Pruebas

Marcas

Invierno

Posiciones

Pruebas

Marcas

Posiciones

Pruebas

Marcas

General

Posiciones

Pruebas

Marcas

Posiciones

Pruebas

Marcas