Comparación: Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Barum Polaris 3 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Premium

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Medio-alto

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Medio-alto

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Medio-alto

5. Barum Polaris 3 Bajo costo

6. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Bajo costo

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 107

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 76

3. Barum Polaris 3 67

4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 66

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 43

6. Yokohama W.drive V905 8

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 23x

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 14x

4. Barum Polaris 3 10x

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 10x

6. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 8x

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 1.

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 3.

4. Barum Polaris 3 3.

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 7.

6. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 12.

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 7.

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

3. Barum Polaris 3 16.

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 24.

5. Firestone Winterhawk 3 32.

6. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 33.

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2.35

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

3. Barum Polaris 3 10.6

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 14

5. Firestone Winterhawk 3 16

6. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 22.25

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2021

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 2020

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 2019

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 2019

6. Barum Polaris 3 2018

1. Barum Polaris 3 Ejemplar

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Muy bien

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Muy bien

4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactorio

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactorio

6. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactorio

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Bueno

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Bueno

3. Barum Polaris 3 Satisfactorio

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactorio

5. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Recomendado condicionalmente

6. Yokohama W.drive V905 Recomendado condicionalmente

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

91.6%

Barum
Polaris 3

73.6%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

72.1%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

70.3%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

68.9%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

66.5%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 B

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

3. Barum Polaris 3 C

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow C

5. Firestone Winterhawk 3 C

6. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93.2%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

90.5%

Barum
Polaris 3

87.3%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

81.4%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

78.3%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

74%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

91.1%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

84.2%

Barum
Polaris 3

79%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

75.4%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

75.8%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71.8%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

80.3%

Barum
Polaris 3

79%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

79.4%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

78.1%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

75%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

71.8%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 C

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 E

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

4. Barum Polaris 3 F

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow F

6. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Barum
Polaris 3

79%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

79.2%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

79.3%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

70.3%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

68.2%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

59.4%

1. Barum Polaris 3 ?

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 ?

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 ?

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow ?

6. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

82.7%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

79.3%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

79.5%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

74.8%

Barum
Polaris 3

0%