Comparación: Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Premium

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Medio-alto

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Medio-alto

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Bajo costo

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 107

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 76

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 66

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 43

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 23x

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 14x

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 8x

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 1.

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 3.

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 12.

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 7.

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 32.

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 33.

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2.35

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 16

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 22.25

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2021

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 2020

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 2019

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Muy bien

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Muy bien

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactorio

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactorio

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Bueno

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Bueno

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactorio

4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Recomendado condicionalmente

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

91%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

71%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

70%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

70.3%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 B

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow C

4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 C

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93.2%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

86%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

81%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

78%

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 80%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 79%

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 75%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 0%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 87%

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 82%

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 76%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 0%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 92%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 84%

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 78%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 0%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

81%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

73%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71.8%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

69%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 81%

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 77%

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 74%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 0%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

81%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

80%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

75%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 79%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 78%

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 70%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 0%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 C

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 E

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow F

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

93%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

79.3%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

76%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

75%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 89%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 83%

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 81%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 0%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 ?

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 ?

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow ?

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

89%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

79.5%