Estos neumáticos fueron probados juntos en 1 prueba(s) con datos detallados de rendimiento. esta página te muestra una comparación completa basada en resultados reales de pruebas directas en lugar de clasificaciones generales.
Puedes explorar comparaciones por disciplina, ver el gráfico de araña, comprobar diferencias de precio y ver qué pruebas se usaron para este análisis. O ver la comparación general →
Comparación directa detallada basada en resultados reales de pruebas
| Organización | Temporada | Año | Dimensión | Acción |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Autobild
|
Verano
|
2018 | 195/65 R15 | Ver |
When it comes to summer tyres, the choices can seem limitless. Today we're comparing two renowned tyre models, the BF Goodrich g-Grip and the Kleber Dynaxer HP3. Both bring different strengths and weaknesses to the table, and we're here to dissect them for you.
The BF Goodrich g-Grip earns a rating of 28% from us, while the Kleber Dynaxer HP3 somewhat surpasses it with an earned 41%. Thus, the latter offers an initial impression of greater satisfaction.
In the comprehensive Autobild test which ranked 50 tyres, the BF Goodrich g-grip stood at the 18th position, while the Dynaxer HP3 trailed close behind at the 19th. Despite the Kleber Dynaxer HP3's slightly lower positioning, it outshined its competitor in certain aspects, notably showing great strength in the 'Wet circle cornering' test. No explicit replacement model for either tyre is indicated in our data at this time.
Diving deeper, the tyres have unique properties. The BF Goodrich g-Grip's hardy design is an asset in tread life and resistance to wear. However, it lacks somewhat in areas of wet braking and road feedback. This, along with its 18th ranking in the Autobild test, adds a few cons to this model's performance.
On the other hand, the Kleber Dynaxer HP3 has shown exceptional wet-grip and cornering performance. The HP3 excels especially in the 'wet circle' cornering test, outperforming many of its rivals, including the g-Grip. One of its potential flaws is that it may not be quite as long-lasting as some competitors, like the g-Grip.
In conclusion, the BF Goodrich g-Grip and the Kleber Dynaxer HP3 have their unique advantages and weaknesses. If you prioritise wet-grip performance and the ability to perform in challenging conditions, the HP3 may better meet your needs. If your priorities lie in durability and long tread life, the BF Goodrich g-Grip could be the tyre for you. Keep in mind it's essential to consider these aspects and base the final decision on what most suits your driving routine and habits.
BF Goodrich g-Grip
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
BF Goodrich g-Grip
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
BF Goodrich g-Grip
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
BF Goodrich g-Grip
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
BF Goodrich g-Grip
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
BF Goodrich g-Grip
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
Comparación visual de todas las categorías de rendimiento de pruebas mutuas.
Compara precios en todas las dimensiones disponibles para estos neumáticos.