• 14 tiendas, 133 850 productos

Comparación: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 (2026)

Resumen de pruebas mutuas

Comparación directa detallada basada en resultados reales de pruebas

Pruebas usadas en la comparación (1)

Organización Temporada Año Dimensión Acción
Autobild Autobild
Verano
2018 195/65 R15 Ver

When it comes to summer tyres, the choices can seem limitless. Today we're comparing two renowned tyre models, the BF Goodrich g-Grip and the Kleber Dynaxer HP3. Both bring different strengths and weaknesses to the table, and we're here to dissect them for you.


The BF Goodrich g-Grip earns a rating of 28% from us, while the Kleber Dynaxer HP3 somewhat surpasses it with an earned 41%. Thus, the latter offers an initial impression of greater satisfaction.


In the comprehensive Autobild test which ranked 50 tyres, the BF Goodrich g-grip stood at the 18th position, while the Dynaxer HP3 trailed close behind at the 19th. Despite the Kleber Dynaxer HP3's slightly lower positioning, it outshined its competitor in certain aspects, notably showing great strength in the 'Wet circle cornering' test. No explicit replacement model for either tyre is indicated in our data at this time.


Diving deeper, the tyres have unique properties. The BF Goodrich g-Grip's hardy design is an asset in tread life and resistance to wear. However, it lacks somewhat in areas of wet braking and road feedback. This, along with its 18th ranking in the Autobild test, adds a few cons to this model's performance.


On the other hand, the Kleber Dynaxer HP3 has shown exceptional wet-grip and cornering performance. The HP3 excels especially in the 'wet circle' cornering test, outperforming many of its rivals, including the g-Grip. One of its potential flaws is that it may not be quite as long-lasting as some competitors, like the g-Grip.


In conclusion, the BF Goodrich g-Grip and the Kleber Dynaxer HP3 have their unique advantages and weaknesses. If you prioritise wet-grip performance and the ability to perform in challenging conditions, the HP3 may better meet your needs. If your priorities lie in durability and long tread life, the BF Goodrich g-Grip could be the tyre for you. Keep in mind it's essential to consider these aspects and base the final decision on what most suits your driving routine and habits.

Comparación de rendimiento

Rendimiento en mojado
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
BF
Goodrich g-Grip
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
82%
Kleber
Dynaxer HP3
Manejo en mojado
BF Goodrich g-Grip
89%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
88%
Curvas en mojado
BF Goodrich g-Grip
98%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
100%
Aquaplaning longitudinal
BF Goodrich g-Grip
87%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
84%
Mejor: Uniroyal RainExpert 3 (100.0%)
Aquaplaning transversal
BF Goodrich g-Grip
78%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
55%
Mejor en categoría: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance (95.0%)
Rendimiento en seco
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
BF
Goodrich g-Grip
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
94%
Kleber
Dynaxer HP3
Manejo en seco
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
94%
Mejor en categoría: Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 (100.0%)
Confort y ruido
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
BF
Goodrich g-Grip
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
68%
Kleber
Dynaxer HP3
Ruido exterior
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
68%
Mejor: Infinity Ecosis (100.0%)
Mejor en categoría: Infinity Ecosis (100.0%)
Economía
BF Goodrich g-Grip
76%
BF
Goodrich g-Grip
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
71%
Kleber
Dynaxer HP3
Resistencia al rodamiento
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
61%
Mejor: Giti Synergy E1 (100.0%)
Kilometraje
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
81%
Mejor: Fulda EcoControl HP (100.0%)
Mejor en categoría: Michelin Energy Saver + (86.5%)

Gráfico de araña de rendimiento

Comparación visual de todas las categorías de rendimiento de pruebas mutuas.

Dimensiones y precios

Compara precios en todas las dimensiones disponibles para estos neumáticos.

Cargando...

Añadir a la comparación