14 tiendas, 142 812 productos

Comparación: Neumáticos similares a Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 (2026)

Tabla de contenido:

Resumen
Mojado
Seco
Costos
Pruebas mutuas
Dimensiones y precios
Comprar %

¿Busca una comparación de Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 con neumáticos de dimensiones similares? aquí puede encontrar información detallada basada en pruebas, reseñas y datos del fabricante.

#	Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 /0%	Firestone Roadhawk /60%	Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport /49%	Kleber Dynaxer HP5 /64%	BF Goodrich Advantage 2 /67%	Semperit Speed-Life 3 /55%	General Tire Grabber GT Plus /68%	Continental EcoContact 6 /77%	Firestone Roadhawk 2 /81%

Dimensiones	R16 - R20	R0 - R21	R0 - R21	R16 - R22	R16 - R21	R15 - R21	R15 - R23	R0 - R24	R16 - R22
Precio	Establecer la dimensión para ver los precios	Establecer la dimensión para ver los precios	Establecer la dimensión para ver los precios	Establecer la dimensión para ver los precios	Establecer la dimensión para ver los precios	Establecer la dimensión para ver los precios	Establecer la dimensión para ver los precios	Establecer la dimensión para ver los precios	Establecer la dimensión para ver los precios
Eliminar

Segmento

1. Continental EcoContact 6 Premium

2. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 Medio-alto

3. Firestone Roadhawk Medio-alto

4. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport Medio-alto

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 Medio-alto

6. BF Goodrich Advantage 2 Medio-alto

7. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Medio-alto

8. Semperit Speed-Life 3 Bajo costo

9. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Bajo costo

Número de tamaños disponibles

1. Continental EcoContact 6 622

2. BF Goodrich Advantage 2 292

3. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 276

4. Firestone Roadhawk 174

5. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 165

6. Firestone Roadhawk 2 143

7. Semperit Speed-Life 3 118

8. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64

9. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 22

Número de pruebas

1. Firestone Roadhawk 21x

2. Semperit Speed-Life 3 14x

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 8x

4. Continental EcoContact 6 6x

5. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 5x

6. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 4x

7. BF Goodrich Advantage 2 3x

8. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 2x

9. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 2x

Mejor posición en la prueba

1. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 2.

2. Semperit Speed-Life 3 2.

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2.

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 2.

5. Firestone Roadhawk 2 3.

6. BF Goodrich Advantage 2 5.

7. Continental EcoContact 6 6.

8. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 7.

9. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9.

Peor posición en la prueba

1. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 7.

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 7.

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9.

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 19.

5. Continental EcoContact 6 23.

6. BF Goodrich Advantage 2 27.

7. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 29.

8. Firestone Roadhawk 31.

9. Semperit Speed-Life 3 43.

Posición media en las pruebas

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 5

2. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 7

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9

4. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 11.6

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 11.75

6. Continental EcoContact 6 11.83

7. Firestone Roadhawk 11.9

8. BF Goodrich Advantage 2 14.33

9. Semperit Speed-Life 3 18.07

Año de la última prueba

1. BF Goodrich Advantage 2 2026

2. Continental EcoContact 6 2026

3. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 2026

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 2026

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 2026

6. Semperit Speed-Life 3 2026

7. Firestone Roadhawk 2023

8. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 2023

9. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 2020

Mejor puntuación en la prueba

1. Firestone Roadhawk Ejemplar

2. Semperit Speed-Life 3 Ejemplar

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Muy recomendable

4. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport Bueno

5. BF Goodrich Advantage 2 Recomendado

6. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 Recomendado

7. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 Satisfactorio

8. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactorio

9. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Satisfactorio

Peor puntuación en la prueba

1. Semperit Speed-Life 3 Bueno

2. BF Goodrich Advantage 2 Recomendado

3. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 Recomendado

4. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 Satisfactorio

5. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactorio

6. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Satisfactorio

7. Firestone Roadhawk Recomendado condicionalmente

8. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport Recomendado condicionalmente

9. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Suficiente

Mojado

(Puntuación global)

Semperit
Speed-Life 3

83%

BF
Goodrich Advantage 2

79%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP5

76%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

76%

Yokohama
BluEarth RV-02

71%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

67%

Firestone
Roadhawk

66%

Cooper
Zeon 4XS Sport

66%

Continental
EcoContact 6

60%

Frenado en mojado

1. BF Goodrich Advantage 2 88%

2. Semperit Speed-Life 3 87%

3. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 80%

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 80%

5. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 80%

6. Firestone Roadhawk 67%

7. Firestone Roadhawk 2 65%

8. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 63%

9. Continental EcoContact 6 61%

Manejo en mojado

1. Semperit Speed-Life 3 83%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 76%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 74%

4. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 72%

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 70%

6. BF Goodrich Advantage 2 67%

7. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 67%

8. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 61%

9. Continental EcoContact 6 56%

Hidroplaneo - longitudinal

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 89%

2. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 80%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 79%

4. BF Goodrich Advantage 2 75%

5. Semperit Speed-Life 3 76%

6. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 72%

7. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 68%

8. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 64%

9. Continental EcoContact 6 58%

Hidroplaneo - cruzar

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 93%

2. BF Goodrich Advantage 2 85%

3. Semperit Speed-Life 3 81%

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 75%

5. Firestone Roadhawk 72%

6. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64%

7. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 55%

8. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 44%

9. Continental EcoContact 6 41%

Curvas en mojado

1. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 89%

2. Semperit Speed-Life 3 81%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 78%

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 77%

5. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 76%

6. Firestone Roadhawk 2 70%

7. Continental EcoContact 6 69%

8. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 62%

9. BF Goodrich Advantage 2 0%

Frenado en mojado según la etiqueta de la ue

1. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 A

2. Firestone Roadhawk A

3. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport A

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 A

5. General Tire Grabber GT Plus A

6. Semperit Speed-Life 3 B

7. Continental EcoContact 6 B

8. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 ?

9. BF Goodrich Advantage 2 ?

Seco

(Puntuación global)

BF
Goodrich Advantage 2

88%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP5

85%

Continental
EcoContact 6

79%

Cooper
Zeon 4XS Sport

77%

Firestone
Roadhawk

76%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

74%

Yokohama
BluEarth RV-02

73%

Semperit
Speed-Life 3

72%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

65%

Frenado en seco

1. BF Goodrich Advantage 2 88%

2. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 88%

3. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 85%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 83%

5. Semperit Speed-Life 3 76%

6. Continental EcoContact 6 77%

7. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 77%

8. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 74%

9. Firestone Roadhawk 2 65%

Comportamiento en conducción en seco

1. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 81%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 75%

3. Continental EcoContact 6 73%

4. Semperit Speed-Life 3 69%

5. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 64%

6. BF Goodrich Advantage 2 0%

7. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 0%

8. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

9. Firestone Roadhawk 2 0%

Confort

(Puntuación global)

Kleber
Dynaxer HP5

92%

Yokohama
BluEarth RV-02

87%

Continental
EcoContact 6

82%

Semperit
Speed-Life 3

79%

BF
Goodrich Advantage 2

78%

Cooper
Zeon 4XS Sport

77%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

72%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

72%

Firestone
Roadhawk

70%

Ruido interior

1. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 82%

2. Continental EcoContact 6 83%

3. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 81%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 77%

5. Semperit Speed-Life 3 75%

6. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 0%

7. BF Goodrich Advantage 2 0%

8. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

9. Firestone Roadhawk 2 0%

Ruido exterior

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 92%

2. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 90%

3. Semperit Speed-Life 3 83%

4. Continental EcoContact 6 80%

5. BF Goodrich Advantage 2 78%

6. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 73%

7. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 72%

8. Firestone Roadhawk 62%

9. Firestone Roadhawk 2 50%

Ruido exterior según la etiqueta de la ue

1. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 69 dB

2. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 70 dB

3. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 70 dB

4. Semperit Speed-Life 3 ?

5. Continental EcoContact 6 ?

6. BF Goodrich Advantage 2 ?

7. General Tire Grabber GT Plus ?

8. Firestone Roadhawk ?

9. Firestone Roadhawk 2 ?

Costos

(Puntuación global)

Continental
EcoContact 6

94%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

88%

Semperit
Speed-Life 3

78%

BF
Goodrich Advantage 2

77%

Yokohama
BluEarth RV-02

73%

Firestone
Roadhawk

71%

Cooper
Zeon 4XS Sport

69%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP5

69%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

38%

Kilometraje

1. Continental EcoContact 6 89%

2. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 78%

3. BF Goodrich Advantage 2 77%

4. Semperit Speed-Life 3 74%

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 69%

6. Firestone Roadhawk 64%

7. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 60%

8. Firestone Roadhawk 2 38%

9. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Consumo de combustible según la etiqueta de la ue

1. Continental EcoContact 6 A

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 B

3. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 C

4. Semperit Speed-Life 3 C

5. Firestone Roadhawk C

6. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport C

7. General Tire Grabber GT Plus C

8. BF Goodrich Advantage 2 ?

9. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 ?

Añadir a la comparación

Hacer

Modelo

Comparación: Neumáticos similares a Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 (2026)

Añadir a la comparación

Añadir a la comparación

Dimensiones y precios

Verano

Posiciones

Pruebas

Marcas

Posiciones

Pruebas

Marcas

Invierno

Posiciones

Pruebas

Marcas

Posiciones

Pruebas

Marcas

General

Posiciones

Pruebas

Marcas

Posiciones

Pruebas

Marcas