Comparación: Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 Medio-alto

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Medio-alto

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Medio-alto

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Bajo costo

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 107

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 43

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 8

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 19x

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 10x

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 8x

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 3.

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 7.

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 12.

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 17.

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 24.

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 33.

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 14

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 22.25

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 2020

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 2019

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 2019

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Muy bien

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactorio

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactorio

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactorio

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Bueno

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactorio

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactorio

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 Recomendado condicionalmente

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

87%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

81%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

72.1%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

63%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 77%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 71%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 92%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 83%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 64%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 84%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 56%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 100%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 81%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 57%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 83%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 79%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 66%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow C

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

92%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

80%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

79%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 97%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 82%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 79%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 76%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 97%

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 80%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 81%

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 78%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 87%

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 82%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 80%

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 81%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

83%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

77%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

73%

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 82%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 81%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 77%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

78%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

77%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 79%

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 76%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 73%

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 66%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow F

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

90%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

73%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

66%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

63%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 95%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 81%

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 72%

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 66%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow ?

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

77%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

69%