Comparación: Tigar Winter 1 vs. Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 Medio-alto

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Medio-alto

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Medio-alto

4. Tigar Winter 1 Bajo costo

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Bajo costo

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 107

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 43

4. Tigar Winter 1 21

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 8

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 19x

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 10x

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 8x

5. Tigar Winter 1 2x

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 3.

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 7.

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 12.

5. Tigar Winter 1 36.

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 17.

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 24.

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 33.

5. Tigar Winter 1 44.

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 14

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 22.25

5. Tigar Winter 1 40

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 2020

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 2019

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 2019

5. Tigar Winter 1 2017

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Muy bien

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactorio

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactorio

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactorio

5. Tigar Winter 1 ?

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Bueno

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactorio

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactorio

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 Recomendado condicionalmente

5. Tigar Winter 1 ?