Comparación: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Premium

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Medio-alto

3. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 Bajo costo

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 360

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 180

3. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 93

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 29x

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 23x

3. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 12x

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 1.

2. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 3.

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 5.

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 13.

2. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 19.

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 30.

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 3.66

2. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 9.33

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 11.04

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 2025

2. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 2025

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 2022

1. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 Ejemplar

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Ganador de la prueba

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Satisfactorio

1. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 Bueno

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Bueno

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Suficiente

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

79%

Semperit
Speed-Grip 5

69%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

68%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 75%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 64%

3. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 65%

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 86%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 77%

3. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 68%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 81%

2. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 78%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 67%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 84%

2. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 73%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 56%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

72%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

71%

Semperit
Speed-Grip 5

67%

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 88%

2. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 67%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 63%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 66%

2. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 64%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 63%

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 81%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 70%

3. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 66%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 78%

2. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 68%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 67%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 83%

2. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 66%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 55%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P B

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 B

3. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 C

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

77%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

74%

Semperit
Speed-Grip 5

64%

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 73%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 53%

3. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 44%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 90%

2. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 80%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 75%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

83%

Semperit
Speed-Grip 5

81%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

62%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 81%

2. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 80%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 64%

1. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 85%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 84%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 0%

1. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 ?

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ?

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 ?

Semperit
Speed-Grip 5

67%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

64%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

58%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 88%

2. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 81%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 42%

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 81%

2. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 48%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 42%

1. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 72%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 69%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 43%

1. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 C

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P C

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 D

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

76.7%

Semperit
Speed-Grip 5

0%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

0%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

75.8%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

23%

Semperit
Speed-Grip 5

23%