Comparación: Continental UltraContact vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Nokian WetProof

1. Continental UltraContact Premium

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Premium

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 Medio-alto

5. Nokian WetProof Medio-alto

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 532

2. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 356

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 153

4. Continental UltraContact 87

5. Nokian WetProof 47

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 16x

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 14x

3. Nokian WetProof 14x

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 3x

5. Continental UltraContact 1x

1. Nokian WetProof 1.

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2.

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 3.

4. Continental UltraContact 7.

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 7.

1. Continental UltraContact 7.

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 11.

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 12.

4. Nokian WetProof 17.

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 19.

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 5.5

2. Nokian WetProof 5.64

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 6.29

4. Continental UltraContact 7

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 15

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2026

2. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 2026

3. Continental UltraContact 2023

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2023

5. Nokian WetProof 2023

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Ejemplar

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Ejemplar

3. Nokian WetProof Muy recomendable

4. Continental UltraContact Bueno

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 Satisfactorio

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Bueno

2. Continental UltraContact Bueno

3. Nokian WetProof Recomendado

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Recomendado

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 Satisfactorio

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

84%

Nokian
WetProof

79%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

75%

Continental
UltraContact

71%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP5

70%

1. Continental UltraContact 85%

2. Nokian WetProof 85%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 80%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 76%

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 70%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 89%

2. Nokian WetProof 72%

3. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 69%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 68%

5. Continental UltraContact 58%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 86%

2. Nokian WetProof 81%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 78%

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 72%

5. Continental UltraContact 71%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance A

2. Nokian WetProof A

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 A

4. Continental UltraContact A

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 ?

Continental
UltraContact

91%

Nokian
WetProof

87%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

86%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP5

78%

1. Continental UltraContact 91%

2. Nokian WetProof 87%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 86%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 83%

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 78%

Continental
UltraContact

88%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

74%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP5

69%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

64%

Nokian
WetProof

56%

1. Continental UltraContact 88%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 74%

3. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 69%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 64%

5. Nokian WetProof 56%

1. Continental UltraContact B

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance B

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 C

4. Nokian WetProof C

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 ?

Kleber
Dynaxer HP5

90%

Nokian
WetProof

86%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

77%

Continental
UltraContact

75%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

75%

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 90%

2. Nokian WetProof 86%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 77%

4. Continental UltraContact 75%

5. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 75%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 69 dB

2. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 70 dB

3. Nokian WetProof ?

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 ?

5. Continental UltraContact ?