Comparación: Continental UltraContact vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 vs. Nokian WetProof

1. Continental UltraContact Premium

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Premium

3. Firestone Roadhawk Medio-alto

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 Medio-alto

5. Nokian WetProof Medio-alto

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 356

2. Firestone Roadhawk 165

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 153

4. Continental UltraContact 87

5. Nokian WetProof 47

1. Firestone Roadhawk 21x

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 16x

3. Nokian WetProof 14x

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 3x

5. Continental UltraContact 1x

1. Nokian WetProof 1.

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2.

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 3.

4. Continental UltraContact 7.

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 7.

1. Continental UltraContact 7.

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 12.

3. Nokian WetProof 17.

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 19.

5. Firestone Roadhawk 31.

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 5.5

2. Nokian WetProof 5.64

3. Continental UltraContact 7

4. Firestone Roadhawk 11.9

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 15

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 2026

2. Continental UltraContact 2023

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2023

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2023

5. Nokian WetProof 2023

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Ejemplar

2. Firestone Roadhawk Ejemplar

3. Nokian WetProof Muy recomendable

4. Continental UltraContact Bueno

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 Satisfactorio

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Bueno

2. Continental UltraContact Bueno

3. Nokian WetProof Recomendado

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 Satisfactorio

5. Firestone Roadhawk Recomendado condicionalmente

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

84%

Nokian
WetProof

79%

Firestone
Roadhawk

73%

Continental
UltraContact

71%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP5

70%

1. Continental UltraContact 85%

2. Nokian WetProof 85%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 76%

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 70%

5. Firestone Roadhawk 67%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 89%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 72%

3. Nokian WetProof 72%

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 69%

5. Continental UltraContact 58%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 86%

2. Nokian WetProof 81%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 79%

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 72%

5. Continental UltraContact 71%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance A

2. Nokian WetProof A

3. Firestone Roadhawk A

4. Continental UltraContact A

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 ?

Kleber
Dynaxer HP5

90%

Nokian
WetProof

86%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

75%

Continental
UltraContact

75%

Firestone
Roadhawk

62%

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 90%

2. Nokian WetProof 86%

3. Continental UltraContact 75%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 75%

5. Firestone Roadhawk 62%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 69 dB

2. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 70 dB

3. Nokian WetProof ?

4. Continental UltraContact ?

5. Firestone Roadhawk ?

Continental
UltraContact

91%

Nokian
WetProof

87%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Firestone
Roadhawk

83%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP5

78%

1. Continental UltraContact 91%

2. Nokian WetProof 87%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 83%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 83%

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 78%

Continental
UltraContact

88%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP5

69%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

64%

Firestone
Roadhawk

64%

Nokian
WetProof

56%

1. Continental UltraContact 88%

2. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 69%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 64%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 64%

5. Nokian WetProof 56%

1. Continental UltraContact B

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance B

3. Firestone Roadhawk C

4. Nokian WetProof C

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 ?